hen pro-democracy demonstrations broke out in Russia late last year, Vladimir Putin could have hardly expected that the most publicized protest to his rule would come from a feminist punk band named Pussy Riot. But that's exactly what happened. Three members of the band — Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, Yekaterina Samutsevich, and Maria Alekhina, all in their 20s — went on trial this week on charges of inciting religious hatred for holding an anti-Putin protest in Moscow's Cathedral of Christ the Savior in February. Specifically, the trio is accused of hooliganism and hate crimes for conducting a boisterous "prayer" to the Virgin Mary to kick Putin out of power. (A video of the protest, which went viral, can be seen below.) The young musicians each face seven years in jail, and the severity of the potential punishment has drawn international condemnation, with stars like Sting and Madonna calling for clemency and Amnesty International describing the three women as "prisoners of conscience." Here, a guide to their case:
Who is Pussy Riot?
A "punk-feminist collective" composed of anonymous "riot grrrl provocateurs," says Joshua Keating at Foreign Policy. The group is known for conducting "spontaneous stunts like appearing in Red Square to perform a song called 'Putin Pissed Himself.'" Other songs include "Fuck the Sexist, Fuck Putin's Henchmen" and "Death to Prison, Freedom to Protest." They usually wear ski masks to remain anonymous, though the three bandmembers on trial have been identified.
What were they protesting?
Putin's authoritarian rule, which has been bolstered over the past decade by support from the Orthodox Russian Church. Forced underground in the atheist days of the Soviet Union, the church has enjoyed a resurgence in the Putin era and is determined to see the three women punished. The church says their behavior caused grave moral damage to the faithful, and witnesses for the prosecution described the pain caused by the women's "devilish skipping" in front of the church's "heavenly gates," giving the trial the feel of a literal witch hunt.
How did the women plead?
The women, appearing at trial in a glass-plated cage, pleaded not guilty to the charges, even as they admitted that they may have made an "ethical mistake."
Why is the maximum sentence so harsh?
"A brief arrest or citation might have been appropriate for the stunt," says The Washington Post in an editorial, "but months or years behind bars is grossly excessive." Critics say that Putin's tolerance for the pro-democracy movement is waning, and that he intends to make an example out of the three women. The case is now seen as a "measure of the Kremlin's resolve in squelching political dissent expressed in unapproved settings," say David M. Herszenhorn and Andrew Roth at The New York Times.
Will there be a backlash?
Possibly. The trial has "put three very human and, in many ways, sympathetic faces on the political opposition movement," say Herszenhorn and Roth. The crackdown also betrays a deep sense of insecurity for a supposedly all-powerful ruler. "What is it about these artists, all women in their 20s, two of whom are also the mothers of young children, that so frightens Russia's leadership?" asks Canada's The Globe and Mail in an editorial. Indeed, Sting, of all people, expressed it best in his protest of the trial, saying, "A sense of proportion — and a sense of humor — is a sign of strength, not a sign of weakness."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why China's Communist Party is headed for collapse
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why Texas Republicans may want to cool the anti-Obama land-grab talk
- Why the poor's investment of choice is so alarming
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- How to make perfect fried rice in 6 easy steps
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Obama doesn't have a manhood problem — but conservatives certainly do
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- Why we need a maximum wage
Subscribe to the Week