igh-powered Republicans are demanding an apology from Vice President Joe Biden for telling a mostly black audience last week that Mitt Romney wants to unchain Wall Street, but "put y'all back in chains." Former GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum accused Biden of "playing the race card," and former New York City Mmayor Rudy Giuliani said the vice president was making an "absolutely blatant appeal to racism." Republicans have called the remarks grounds for President Obama to throw Biden off the ticket and replace him with Hillary Clinton. Democrats defended Biden, saying there "isn't a racist bone" in his body, and Obama campaign spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter said Romney campaign supporters were just "whining" about Biden's choice of words to distract from his message — that the GOP cares more about wealthy bankers than the working class. Was Biden making a legitimate point, or should he say sorry?
In the name of civility, Biden should apologize: "Liberals routinely dismiss Biden's gaffes as the rhetorical excesses of an overly exuberant speaker — it's 'Joe being Joe,'" says The Boston Globe in an editorial. But if Mitt Romney or running mate Paul Ryan made a crack about slavery, they "would be pilloried for racial insensitivity." Of course, Biden isn't the worst offender against civility in American politics, "but he's an offender nonetheless, and he should apologize."
"Biden should apologize for 'back in chains' remark"
But Biden isn't actually sorry: Biden won't apologize because his "inflammatory rhetoric" was no gaffe, says Paul Mirengoff at Power Line. It was an attempt to rally black voters behind Obama, because Obama will probably need to carry the black vote as overwhelmingly as he did in 2008 to win the election. Walking back Biden's remark "would amount to a concession that the Republicans don't actually have it in for African-Americans," which is not something Obama is eager to admit.
"Why didn’t Team Obama walk back Joe Biden's remark?"
Republicans don't deserve an apology: What Biden said was "wince-worthy," says Jonathan Capehart at The Washington Post, but "neither the vice president nor the Obama-Biden re-election campaign has anything to apologize for." Romney is accusing Obama and Biden of stirring up "division and anger and hate," but his whining is galling given his party's "birther lies" and "relentless obstruction, recalcitrance, and rudeness" toward Obama. The GOP should spare us the hypocritical "scripted outrage."
"Mitt Romney's 'divisive and angry' turn"
- How does chocolate milk stack up as a sports drink?
- Why Republicans shouldn't get too excited over Obama's stumbles
- The 10 worst-reviewed movies of 2013
- Diagnosing the Home Alone burglars' injuries: A professional weighs in
- The last racial taboo
- 10 things you need to know today: December 11, 2013
- 7 enduring lessons from It's a Wonderful Life
- How did Love Actually become so controversial? A theory
- Watch The Daily Show roll its eyes at outrage over Obama's handshake with Raul Castro
- Watch The Daily Show mock the NSA and the gamers they're spying on
Subscribe to the Week