oldiers often smear camouflage makeup on their faces before entering dangerous combat zones. But sometimes, the oil- or wax-based chemicals in face paint catch fire from a blast, which inflicts even more damage on the skin. That's why the Army is funding research for a new kind of high-tech combat makeup that, instead of putting a soldier at extra risk, can actually withstand a thermal blast as hot as 1,112 degrees Fahrenheit. A closer look at the Army's bomb-repellant makeup:
What does the face paint do?
"When a roadside bomb or other explosive device goes off, it hits everything nearby with an extreme blast of pressure" followed immediately by more than 1,000 degrees of skin-searing heat, says Colin Lecher at Popular Science, or about the same temperature as the burning tip of a cigarette. The Army's new face paint, presented this week at the American Chemical Society's meeting, not only functions as a heat shield, but is also waterproof and incorporates DEET, a type of insect repellant.
How effective is it at protecting skin?
Normally a bomb blast lasts a mere two seconds. Tests showed that the makeup protects "naked hands and feet for 15 seconds before mild, first degree burns appeared," says Molly Docherty at New Scientist. (Watch a demonstration below.) That gives a soldier valuable time to scramble away to safety.
How was the makeup made?
In order to create the skin cream, researchers turned to silicones rather than the "fatty substances in traditional face paint," says Megan Gannon at LiveScience. One problem: DEET bug repellant is highly flammable, yet it must compose 35 percent of all camouflage makeup, according to a military mandate. To solve the problem, scientists encapsulated DEET with a water-rich hydrogel, which prevented it from catching fire.
What's next?
The research team from the University of Southern Mississippi is putting together a clear, colorless version to be used by firefighters. They're also working on a fire-resistant formula to fireproof clothing and tents, says New Scientist's Docherty.
See for yourself:
Sources: Live Science, New Scientist, Popular Science
- A linguistic dissection of 7 annoying teenage sounds
- Is Greek yogurt hurting the environment?
- WATCH: Suspect defends brutal beheading of London man in broad daylight
- The politics behind Kanye West's 'New Slaves'
- 32 TV shows to watch in 2013 [Updated]
- Confessions of a trust-fund baby
- Sadly, you are uglier than you think
- The FBI kills Tamerlan Tsarnaev's friend: 4 things we know [Updated]
- 4 burning questions Obama must answer about drones and terrorism
- 'The Choom Gang': 9 juiciest details from Barack Obama's days as a pothead
- The politics behind Kanye West's 'New Slaves'
- Are we on the cusp of a solar energy boom?
- Why Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn doesn't want tornado relief money
- WATCH: Jon Stewart hates everyone in Washington now
- LIVE UPDATES: Massive tornado tears through Oklahoma City area
- Angry at the government? 5 ways you can fight back
- 7 purported health benefits of drinking coffee
- What is a quantum computer — and why does Google need one?
- Why NASA is funding a 3D pizza printer
- The cool backstory of the Slurpee
|
||
|
The daily gossip: Paris Hilton is releasing another album, and more |
|
|
The daily gossip: Seth MacFarlane definitely won't be hosting the Oscars next year, and more |
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||













