he Obama administration has finalized its new standards for cars and light trucks, mandating that automakers double the average fuel efficiency of their fleets to 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. The ambitious rules — negotiated at length between the Environmental Protection Agency, 13 automakers, auto unions, and environmental groups — represent the most important step ever taken to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil, says President Obama. The White House predicts the new rules will cut greenhouse gas emissions of cars and light trucks in half by 2025, while saving consumers a ton in fuel costs. Obama's GOP rival Mitt Romney, however, says the "extreme" new standards will force consumers to buy pricier vehicles, such as hybrids, offsetting any gas savings. Are the rules over the top?
No. Everybody wins under the new standards: The new rules are "a boon to a key American industry, a godsend to American consumers, and a bold stroke against climate disruption," says Michael Brune at The Huffington Post. Car owners will save "$8,000 over the lifetime of a vehicle sold in 2025," while automakers can continue to capitalize on the growing popularity of fuel-efficient cars. And since the U.S. uses so much of its "oil for transportation, improving fuel efficiency is by far the most powerful tool we have for moving American beyond oil." This is a "high-water mark for the Obama administration" — truly "change we can believe in."
"Obama's greenest day"
Yes. This will actually cost consumers dearly: "If you've been waiting around to buy a new car, better hurry up," says Daniel Greenfield at FrontPage. By 2025, the only model you'll be able to afford, if you're lucky, is a "small hybrid cube." These new rules could price "almost 7 million people out of the new car market." President Herbert Hoover once promised "a chicken in every pot and a car in every garage," but under Obama "I wouldn't count on being able to get the car."
"Why you will never buy a car again"
In the end, Americans will embrace these new rules: "Most Americans don't enjoy watching the meter run up as they fill their gas tanks," and a majority "say they prefer fuel-efficient cars and trucks," says Deborah Solomon at Bloomberg. Sure, new rules would increase the average price of a car by $1,800, but that's more than compensated for by the fuel savings. Romney's reaction highlights "the stark choice voters face this November about the path of U.S. energy policy." Obama has taken progressive, practical steps to reduce the country's dependence on foreign oil. Romney, on the other hand, has vowed to overturn the new standards, while rejuvenating the pollution-spewing coal industry, neither of which makes environmental or economic sense.
"Romney needs to make a u-turn on fuel standards"
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why China's Communist Party is headed for collapse
- Why Texas Republicans may want to cool the anti-Obama land-grab talk
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Why the poor's investment of choice is so alarming
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How to make perfect fried rice in 6 easy steps
- Obama doesn't have a manhood problem — but conservatives certainly do
- Why Antonin Scalia was right to defend a drug dealer
- Why we need a maximum wage
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
Subscribe to the Week