he Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday sent the state's controversial voter identification law, which would require all voters at the polls to show a specific form of identification, back to a lower court for further consideration. The decision deferred judgment on a Republican-backed measure that Democrats say is intended to suppress minority and lower-income voters. Four of the court's six justices agreed that a lower-court judge, Robert Simpson, should hold new hearings to determine whether the state could distribute the necessary identification in time before the November election. Two justices dissented, arguing that it was clear that the government could not implement the law without disenfranchising some voters.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Here's proof that Justin Bieber is just as spoiled as you always thought
- Why is it so expensive to build a bridge in America?
- 7 ways to be the most interesting person in any room
- What the collapse of the Ming Dynasty can tell us about American decline
- 22 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why I'm sick and tired of seeing naked women on HBO
- The GOP must try to win over African-Americans
- Why Ted Cruz is the real-life Frank Underwood
Subscribe to the Week