hat could possibly tempt college kids more magnetically than sex, cigarettes, and booze? If a new study from the University of Chicago is to be believed, Facebook. Well, social media generally, says Doug Barry at Jezebel. To be fair, "the urge to have sex is stronger," but "people are more likely to succumb to the urge to float around on the social-media lazy river by checking Twitter and Facebook, the two most alluring internet sirens around." In other words, "social media's seductiveness is, quite simply, more powerful than sex."
I'm not buying it. How did this study work?
Researchers at Chicago's Booth College of Business gave special BlackBerrys to about 250 undergraduates in Germany. For a week, the participants were asked every half-hour to report any craving they'd experienced since the last report, how strong it was (from "strong" to "irresistible"), and whether they gave in. Along with confessions about compulsions to tweet and check Facebook, the subjects weighed in on their desire for sex, tobacco, alcohol, and, oddly enough, work. But the urge that was hardest to resist scratching was the social media itch.
The study's lead author, Wilhem Hofmann, has two theories: Facebook is more easily satisfied than other urges, and "it feels like it does not cost much to engage in these activities, even though one wants to resist." In other words, says David Lazarus at The Los Angeles Times, "cheap thrills." That's not the full explanation, says Tim Worstall at Forbes. "Sex is a self-limiting activity" — in other words, once you've done the deed, you're usually sated for at least several hours — but "checking Twitter or Facebook is simply not self-limiting in the same manner."
So what's the takeaway here?
Facebook and Twitter are addictive, and plenty of people have a hard time cutting the cord — sadly, the study's participants had a similar relationship to work. But I'm not convinced this proves that today's youth crave social media more than sex, says Forbes' Worstall. I mean, "I do agree that the youth of today are a little different from we were when we were young," but not that different. Look at it this way: We also eat more than we copulate, "but 'mealtimes are more tempting than sex' doesn’t have quite the same ring to it, does it?" Well, fine, "but that doesn't make the urge to tweet or post to Facebook any less strong," says Daniel Terdiman at CNET. The study doesn't conclusively show whether this urge "affects internet junkies' sex lives," but one thing's for sure: "This is just the kind of study that inspires those who are not internet junkies to tell people to get a life."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Attack of the invasive species
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- 14 wonderful words with no English equivalent
- Why Easter is so important to Christians
- Why would a young person today be religious?
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- The world's dumbest idea: Taxing solar energy
- Which states get screwed worst by the Electoral College?
Subscribe to the Week