Former CIA director David Petraeus has agreed to testify before House and Senate committees investigating the deadly Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, even though he stepped down last week over an increasingly complex sex scandal. Petraeus was originally scheduled to appear on Capitol Hill on Thursday. When he quit, Democratic and Republican lawmakers alike complained that the scandal shouldn't prevent them from hearing from the man who was in charge of the CIA when two of the agency's contractors, along with Ambassador Chris Stevens and another American, were killed in Libya. Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) even questioned whether Petraeus' fear that the FBI would expose his extramarital affair had made him "consciously or subconsciously" inclined to back up the Obama administration's initial suggestion that the attack was a spontaneous outburst rather than a planned terrorist strike. Will Petraeus' testimony, expected behind closed doors later this week, clear up lingering questions about Benghazi?
It's possible we might finally learn the truth: Petraeus was in charge during the "collapse in both pre-attack intelligence and after-attack response," says Jennifer Rubin at The Washington Post. He also went to Benghazi after the siege and talked to people involved. The American people have a right to know everything he does about "what the heck went on." Republicans "seem disinclined to let Petraeus off the hook," so maybe we'll finally get the unvarnished truth rather than administration spin.
"Petraeus : Time for truth-telling, finally"
Brace yourself for another whitewash: The fact that Petraeus stepped up so willingly "probably means he will have nothing meaningful to add," says Rick Moran at The American Thinker. If the White House suspected he was about to drop a bombshell, it could have blocked his appearances. "Since they are apparently allowing him to go forward, it looks like the former CIA director won't add much to the timeline he has already signed off on."
"Petreaus agrees to testify before Congress on Benghazi"
At least this should silence conspiracy theorists: Even if Petraeus doesn't tell Congress anything new, says Doug Mataconis at Outside the Beltway, his testimony could provide welcome clarity. The public might remain in the dark, as his appearances will be held in secret "due to the classified nature of the matters being discussed." But the fact that Petraeus is showing up at all, however, could "put the lie to the accusations of some on the Right [who allege] that [revealing] the sex scandal was some way to prevent Petraeus from testifying."
"David Petraeus to testify before intelligence committees"
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to
- After Ferguson, we don't need another dialogue on race
- The government is getting into the fact-checking business. Be very, very afraid.
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- The world is on fire and neither Democrats or Republicans have a clue
- In defense of Obama's golfing
- The secret to handling pressure like astronauts, Navy SEALs, and samurai
- How Democrats might goad the GOP into shutting down the government
- Your literary playlist: A guide to the music of Haruki Murakami
- A trick for better lunch sandwiches
Subscribe to the Week