Pope Benedict XVI on Monday announced that he had joined Twitter, part of a campaign by the leader of the Roman Catholic Church to better connect with his 1.2-billion-strong flock. Benedict chose the handle @pontifex — Latin for "pontiff" — and is already being followed by more than 240,000 people. But Benedict isn't exactly returning the love: He is following only seven other Twitter accounts, all of which are foreign-language versions of himself in which he speaks in different tongues.
Of course, everyone knows the Pope himself probably won't be signing on to Twitter and keeping up with the latest from the Biebs. (After the pope physically clicks "send" on his first tweet on Dec. 12, his staff members will be the ones sending out Pope-approved messages.) But if the whole point of the exercise is to recognize a social media connection with his religious followers, shouldn't he at least follow (and thus receive messages from) someone other than himself? "Too many celebrities and leaders on Twitter make the mistake of using it only as a transmission system without following any other users," says Joshua Keating at Foreign Policy. "Benedict could start with other religious leaders, or political figures like Barack Obama and David Cameron."
Indeed, @barackobama follows nearly 670,000 people, while @whitehouse follows 168 (mostly government departments, which means the different parts of the executive branch could technically communicate with each over Twitter). But clearly, the term "follow" seems potentially problematic for a religious leader. "He won't follow anyone for now," said Greg Burke, a communications adviser to the Pope. "He will be followed." In fact, the Dalai Lama, a frequent Tweeter, follows exactly zero people. And if Benedict were to follow members of his own church, he could bruise the feelings of those who were excluded. "If he follows a cardinal, then why not an archbishop?" said Burke. "You can see where it could get tricky."
And while the Pope is brand new to social media, he is not entirely unfamiliar with its pitfalls. "In a document issued last year, he said the possibilities of new media and social networks offered 'a great opportunity,'" says Phillip Pullella at Reuters, "but warned of the risks of depersonalization, alienation, self-indulgence, and the dangers of having more virtual friends than real ones." On second thought, perhaps Benedict knows exactly what he's doing.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why you shouldn't eat dog. Not even once.
- How U.S. special forces are preparing for the worst-case scenario in North Korea
- Why Israel can no longer let the Palestinian Authority be responsible for security in the West Bank
- Why you should really take a nap this afternoon, according to science
- Here's the schedule very successful people follow every day
- Why charity can't solve society's deepest problems
- How social conservatives became a minority in need of protection
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Grammar quiz: Do you know the passive voice?
- I hate Ayn Rand — but here's why my fellow conservatives love her
Subscribe to the Week