The $100 billion in tax breaks granted to holders of 401(k) plans every year may be a big waste of money, said Ray Fisman. Harvard economists looked at data from Denmark and found that a change in the law that sets savings incentives “had scarcely any impact on the rate at which Danes accumulated nest eggs.” Nearly 85 percent of them didn’t put away any more or less than they had before. It’s true that Danes “love herring, rye bread, and socialized medicine in a way that many Americans find puzzling,” but they’re surely no less attentive than we are to pension plans. The study suggests that instead of offering tax breaks to encourage savings, the government should harness “the incredible inertia that seems inherent to the human condition.” Simply establishing a hefty default amount that employees set aside from their monthly paychecks will do more than anything else to promote higher retirement savings. Most people “never get around to changing the amount of their monthly payments.” Nudge people to contribute and we’ll see savings increase. “No government subsidy required.”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- The Obama era is over. The presidency continues.
- America created the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria? Meet the ISIS 'truthers'
- What is Molly? Everything you need to know about the party drug
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Russia's giant spy ship was a high-tech disaster waiting to happen
- How American businessmen are ruining American business — and the U.S. economy
- On ISIS, neocons and liberal hawks have a 'boy who cried wolf' problem
- How Harry Houdini escaped death
- The constant struggle of running a family farm in 21st century America
- 7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to
Subscribe to the Week