n the aftermath of President Obama's lopsided victory in the presidential election, there was a general consensus that he held a winning hand as he began negotiating a budget deal with the GOP to avoid going over the fiscal cliff. Obama campaigned on a pledge to raise taxes on households making more than $250,000 a year. A majority of Americans support that position. And Republicans were painted into a corner: If they didn't accept Obama's position, all the Bush tax cuts would expire at the end of the year, drastically raising taxes on all Americans. If the GOP blocked Obama, the thinking went, voters would blame Republicans for raising everyone's tax bill in order to protect the rich.
Obama was so firm on the $250,000 threshold that he reportedly told Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) that it was not even a part of the negotiations. "I get that for free," he said, referring to $800 billion in revenue that the tax hike on America's rich would generate. And yet, with the midnight deadline fast approaching, it appears that Obama has dropped his hardline stance on taxes. According to Politico, Vice President Joe Biden and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell are hammering out a last-minute deal that would raise taxes on households with more than $450,000 in annual income, and individuals with $400,000.
That's not a lot of revenue. Indeed, as Jonathan Chait at New York notes, "the $250,000 a year threshold was too high to begin with." Now, in exchange for raising the threshold to $450,000, Republicans reportedly may agree to extend unemployment benefit insurance for two million out-of-work Americans. The fiscal cliff's automatic spending cuts would presumably be punted to another date (possibly setting up — ugh — yet another fiscal cliff scenario).
In other words, it looks like all Democrats will get are the unemployment benefits, which are temporary, and a tax rate hike on less than 1 percent of Americans.
What does the GOP get? A possibly permanent extension of almost all the Bush tax cuts. And a lot of leverage for future negotiations: Early next year, Congress will debate whether to raise the debt ceiling, and at that point Obama will not hold any cards. With the U.S. at risk of defaulting on its debt, Obama will come under immense pressure from Republicans to match a "dollar of spending cuts for every dollar of debt-ceiling increase," says Ezra Klein at The Washington Post.
The Obama administration has drawn a line in the sand on the debt ceiling, saying raising it is not up for negotiation. But what Republican will believe him after he caved on taxes? After he exchanged his strongest negotiating position in years for a trickle of revenue? Unsurprisingly, liberals are furious. "Suddenly that sinking feeling, the sense that you've got a leader you can count on to wimp out when it matters, is back," says Paul Krugman at The New York Times.
- WATCH: Jon Stewart and Bill O'Reilly spar over the Obama scandals
- WATCH: Suspect defends brutal beheading of London man in broad daylight
- Is Greek yogurt hurting the environment?
- A linguistic dissection of 7 annoying teenage sounds
- 32 TV shows to watch in 2013 [Updated]
- The FBI kills Tamerlan Tsarnaev's friend: 4 things we know [Updated]
- Confessions of a trust-fund baby
- 7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to
- Sadly, you are uglier than you think
- The politics behind Kanye West's 'New Slaves'
- The politics behind Kanye West's 'New Slaves'
- Are we on the cusp of a solar energy boom?
- Why Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn doesn't want tornado relief money
- WATCH: Jon Stewart hates everyone in Washington now
- LIVE UPDATES: Massive tornado tears through Oklahoma City area
- Angry at the government? 5 ways you can fight back
- 7 purported health benefits of drinking coffee
- What is a quantum computer — and why does Google need one?
- Why NASA is funding a 3D pizza printer
- The cool backstory of the Slurpee
|
||
|
The daily gossip: Paris Hilton is releasing another album, and more |
|
|
The daily gossip: Seth MacFarlane definitely won't be hosting the Oscars next year, and more |
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||













