It just keeps getting worse for Boeing's 787 Dreamliner. After a week of mounting problems, regulators around the world, including the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, have grounded the aircraft over safety concerns. In particular, inspectors are scrutinizing the Dreamliner's lithium-ion battery, a cutting-edge piece of equipment meant to reduce fuel costs.
There are currently 50 Dreamliners in use, six of which are operated by United Airlines. Nearly half the world's Dreamliners are owned by Japan Airlines and All Nippon Airways, which was forced to emergency-land a Dreamliner this week after the battery malfunctioned. It remains unclear what happened to the battery, though it was reportedly a blackened mess when it was removed from the aircraft. Other countries that agreed to ground the aircraft include Poland, India, Chile, and Qatar.
Boeing executives maintain that the Dreamliner is safe. "We are confident that the 787 is safe and we stand behind its overall integrity," said CEO Jim McNerney.
Still, the worldwide grounding of a new aircraft has few precedents. Industry analyst Scott Hamilton tells Reuters that a grounding "is about the worst thing that can happen to an airplane program." And if the Dreamliner's lithium-ion batteries are defective, it could lead to some scary scenarios. According to The New York Times:
[Boeing chief engineer Mike Sinnett] said that if the lithium-ion batteries started a fire, it would be nearly impossible to put out because the batteries produce oxygen when burning. Mr. Sinnett said that the plane was designed to survive such an event in flight, when the cabin’s air-pressure system protects passengers and allows the plane to vent the smoke outside. The plane is also designed, he said, to contain a fire to a small area.
"Fire suppressants just won’t work on a situation like that," he said in the conference call. "So something like that is very difficult to put out." [New York Times]
If the batteries need to be replaced, it would cause Boeing innumerable headaches. Reverting to nickel-cadmium or lead-acid batteries would make the planes heavier, less fuel-efficient, and potentially less attractive to airlines. It would also lead to a cascade of delays on new orders, which need to come through for Boeing to realize a profit on its costly investment. Indeed, Boeing had hoped to begin pumping out 10 Dreamliners a month, a plan that is now on the backburner.
So far, no airline has canceled its orders, and analysts continue to say that such an event is unlikely. However, Poland's state-controlled LOT Airlines said it would only accept its upcoming delivery of three Dreamliners if all the aircraft's technical issues are resolved.
And of course, there is the question of consumer confidence. "If I was going to fly on a Dreamliner for this trip, I would cancel it and re-book on another flight using 'proven winner' airplanes that have a good safety record," one frequent traveler tells USA Today. Boeing really needs to put questions of safety to rest before sentiments like that grow.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to
- After Ferguson, we don't need another dialogue on race
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- In defense of Obama's golfing
- The secret to handling pressure like astronauts, Navy SEALs, and samurai
- 10 things you need to know today: August 27, 2014
- Your literary playlist: A guide to the music of Haruki Murakami
- Russia's new air force is a mystery
- How I became a borderline hoarder
- How Hillary Clinton's 'smart power' turned Libya into a dumpster fire
Subscribe to the Week