oo-big-to-fail banks have failed us, said Gretchen Morgenson in The New York Times, and now a "long-standing truth-teller" on their excesses is suggesting they be "chopped into pieces." Richard Fisher, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, argued last week that despite the Dodd-Frank Act, the nation's megabanks still have taxpayers on the hook for future bailouts, and are also gumming up the Fed's recovery efforts by sitting on funds instead of lending them out. The 12 largest of the nation's 5,600 commercial banks hold 69 percent of assets, Fisher points out, but they make little of that money available to the general economy; most small-business loans come from much smaller community banks. As "a voice of the establishment," Fisher is hardly proposing taking an ax to the megabanks, said Josh Boak in The Fiscal Times. His suggestion is to make federal deposit insurance and cheap Fed loans apply only to retail operations, not to security trading and other more speculative operations. That would compel the biggest banks to "behave more responsibly, possibly spinning off their riskiest divisions under market pressure."
Even Jamie Dimon is now paying lip service to reining in the banks, said Jonathan Weil at Bloomberg. The head of JPMorgan Chase said this week that we should "get rid of too-big-to-fail." Well, yes, who could argue with that? But such pious talk from the likes of Dimon is "like Darth Vader bemoaning the intergalactic dominance of the Death Star." Instead of suggesting that somebody take action, "JPMorgan should be doing something about JPMorgan to make sure it's not too big to fail — like break itself up." Yet we all know "that's a pipe dream."
"Senators from opposite ends of the U.S. political spectrum," though, are now seriously taking up the cause, said William Isaac and Cornelius Hurley in the Financial Times. There's a growing realization that we need to end the taxpayer guarantees that Dodd-Frank left in place for "systemically important" banks like JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, and Bank of America. To control risk-taking, "the failure of a business must always be a realistic option." Maybe this new Congress will finally get tough with these privileged institutions, said Robert Reich in the San Francisco Chronicle. "The oven is ready. All we need is another multibillion-dollar banking loss due to bad bets — like JPMorgan Chase's $6 billion loss last year — and the biggest banks are cooked."
- A linguistic dissection of 7 annoying teenage sounds
- Confessions of a trust-fund baby
- WATCH: Suspect defends brutal beheading of London man in broad daylight
- An embattled IRS official takes the 5th: Damning evidence of guilt?
- The FBI kills Tamerlan Tsarnaev's friend: 4 things we know [Updated]
- Sadly, you are uglier than you think
- How the White House's war on media backfired
- The politics behind Kanye West's 'New Slaves'
- Are we on the cusp of a solar energy boom?
- Why Portland refuses to fluoridate its drinking water
- The politics behind Kanye West's 'New Slaves'
- Are we on the cusp of a solar energy boom?
- Why Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn doesn't want tornado relief money
- WATCH: Jon Stewart hates everyone in Washington now
- LIVE UPDATES: Massive tornado tears through Oklahoma City area
- Angry at the government? 5 ways you can fight back
- 7 purported health benefits of drinking coffee
- What is a quantum computer — and why does Google need one?
- Why NASA is funding a 3D pizza printer
- The cool backstory of the Slurpee
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||













