ust last year, Apple was a tech investor's dream, and its stock hit $700 in September as gadget junkies snapped up Apple's industry-dominating iPhones and iPads. Since then, however, Apple's stock has been in a prolonged slide. Even when the company announced better-than-expected quarterly profits of $13.1 billion and record sales of (47.8 million) and iPads (22.9 million), its stock dove by as much as 12 percent early Thursday. What went wrong? Apple's profits went flat, fueling fears that its dominance is slipping as it tweaks old gadgets instead of unveiling game-changing new ones. With Samsung and other rival smartphone and tablet makers making gains, Apple's stock is now trading around $450, and some analysts wonder whether the company can ever climb back to its peak. "Apple's been on top for so long now," says Matt Warman in Britain's Telegraph, "there is only one way it can go."
Indeed, Apple shares will never get back to $700, says The Economist. The stock has recovered after being "mauled by bears" before, but this time is different. The company's visionary co-founder, Steve Jobs, is dead, and since his passing in 2011, Apple "has concentrated on sprucing up its existing products." These days, tech blogs are buzzing about Samsung's latest Galaxy smartphone, due out in March, the way they used to about iPhones. The nearest thing Apple has to the next big thing is an iTV, expected later this year, but it will have plenty of competition out of the gate and is "no surefire blockbuster."
Even if [Apple] produces a cheaper iPhone, pushes deep into China and wows the world with a smart TV, its shares will not reconquer last year's peak. Competition is now tougher in its core markets. Rivals will not let it disrupt new ones so easily. Apple may dip into its $137 billion cash lake to boost its share price by paying fatter dividends or buying back more stock. That would delight some investors, but others would see it as a tacit admission that the firm's great innovation engine has stalled. Apple won't crumble, but it has peaked. [Economist]
The fantasy that "Apple would be the first organization in history to grow forever" has finally dissolved, says Jeff Macke at Yahoo Finance. "What matters now is fixing the company." It can climb back with three drastic but simple steps. First, it has to fire Tim Cook, who took over in 2011. The company's stumbles are on him, and "it's time to give him the hook." Next, the company needs to fill its vacant retail head job with someone who has vision. Finally, it needs to unveil bold new products, instead of tweaking old ones by fiddling with their shapes and colors.
Innovative products that fail don't kill a company but milking the same old stuff forever does. As it stands Apple is operating on the playbook Sony came up with in 1990. It didn't work for them and it won't work for Apple.
Until Apple finds the courage to move beyond its legacy the stock is dead money, at best. Shares will bounce and drop and gyrate, but long-term investors are better off elsewhere. [Yahoo]
But as "Apple's luster dims on Wall Street," says Andrew Tangel at The Los Angeles Times, its stock is actually "becoming a bargain." If any other company had posted an earnings report as good as Apple's, says S&P Dow Jones Indices analyst Howard Silverblatt, "we'd be breaking out champagne." When it comes to Apple, people have unreasonable expectations, so they're pushing the company's shares lower than they should be. Apple's price-to-earnings ratio, a shorthand measure of a stock's value, has dropped to 10.5, far below the average of 15 for the broad Standard & Poor's 500 index. In other words, Apple stock is selling at a "steep discount," Tangel says. Investors might actually want to buy now, before Apple's stock starts going back up.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why we need a maximum wage
- Why Antonin Scalia was right to defend a drug dealer
- The sexual politics of Game of Thrones just got enormously worse
- Why Mindy Kaling — not Lena Dunham — is the body positive icon of the moment
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Why Narendra Modi is not a shoo-in to become India's next prime minister
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- The case for killing law school
Subscribe to the Week