President Obama is giving back five percent of his $400,000 salary this year, in a show of solidarity with federal workers being furloughed due to the sequester budget cuts. The president reportedly has already written the first of what will be $20,000 in checks to the Treasury. Administration officials announced Obama's decision a day after Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter said they were returning a share of their salaries, too, to mirror the pay that civilian employees in their department, one of the hardest hit, will lose when they are furloughed for 14 days between March, when the sequester took effect, and the end of the fiscal year in September.
The money Obama is sending back won't solve the country's budget problems, of course. "Given that the federal government spends between $300 to $400 million an hour," notes Martin Austermuhle at DCist, "Obama's contribution would fund, well, not even a second's worth of government work." Still, it's meaningful as a show of solidarity. "The real news," says Dan Amira at New York, "is that most members of Congress — the people (many of them millionaires) directly responsible for the sequester — aren't doing this, too."
Obama deserves some credit here, argues Bridgette P. LaVictoire at Lez Get Real. "The gesture may be more important than anything else anyone's doing in Washington" to confront this problem. "Negotiations between the House Republicans and the Obama Administration pretty much broke down ahead of the cuts going into force." Meanwhile, the sequester's cuts are being felt all over — federal courts are cutting hours, "causing problems for case loads;" workers at missile-testing ranges are getting cut; cruise passengers are waiting for hours due to belt-tightening at Customs. If nothing else, Obama is calling attention to "the lack of work being done by the Republicans in the House of Representatives" to fix things.
Please, this is chump change, says the New York Daily News in an editorial, for "a man who has no worries about living expenses" and has plenty of other income (from book royalties, for example) besides. Instead of shallow gestures, "Obama would earn full pay by leading the way." Even if $20,000 is a "real sacrifice," says Erika Johnsen at Hot Air, this is "a politically inexpensive, empty gesture designed to make it look like the president is a sympathetic yet ultimately powerless pawn in the sequestration drama, when the man not only signed off on the thing, but deliberately tried to make it all as painful as possible and refused to get on board with any mitigating efforts."
"Yes, when you're president, and set for life financially, a $20,000 giveback to Uncle Sam really doesn't cost you much of anything," says Linda Feldmann at The Christian Science Monitor. Obama will make that much back in five minutes of the first paid speech he makes after leaving office. Still, with Hagel and Carter returning some of their paychecks, "It became increasingly clear that Obama had to do this. A bandwagon has been forming, and he had to jump on, especially as the day draws near when some federal workers begin to lose pay with forced days off." It was time for Obama to take this stand.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 10 things you need to know today: September 30, 2014
- How liberals are unwittingly paving the way for the legalization of adult incest
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- The troubling persistence of eugenicist thought in modern America
- Why the Chinese military is only a paper dragon
- Libertarianism's terrible, horrible, no good, very bad idea
- Are hedge funds doomed?
- How the Simpsons/Family Guy crossover revealed the worst of both shows
- Eric Holder blew it as attorney general. His replacement will, too,
Subscribe to the Week