Wow. An early version of this post was replete with errors. And it's a tiny post! So apologies all around. A corrected version is below.
The near-real-time release of Supreme Court audio is a recent development, but the court (who knew?) has been taping its sessions for more than 60 years. And now, everyone else can enjoy reams and reams of historical arguments and cases that heretofore were only given to historians, and even then, quite selectively.
The Oyez Project, supported by the Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago-Kent College of Law, has mined the National Archives and put them all together — hundreds of cases since 1955. And the Supreme Court will add the cases to its website by next week, according to NPR.
If you've ever wanted to hear how Roe v. Wade was argued, your feast will be bountiful.
Or Gideon v. Wainwright, which formalized the right to counsel. Or Griswold v. Connecticut, which formalized the right to contraception and expanded the legal definition of the right to privacy. Or New York Times v. Sullivan, which clarified libel law. They're all there.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- The U.S. is about to sell weapons to Vietnam. That's bad news for China.
- Why is the Pentagon stuffing caves in Norway full of tanks?
- What the Middle Ages can tell us about the GOP's big charity myth
- An open letter to #brands about Gamergate
- Did the media get Ferguson wrong?
- The most sensible GOP alternative to ObamaCare comes from a Senate candidate who is almost sure to lose
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- 'Having it all' has officially jumped the shark
- Did Republicans overshoot on the Ebola panic?
- 10 things you need to know today: October 23, 2014
Subscribe to the Week