Wow. An early version of this post was replete with errors. And it's a tiny post! So apologies all around. A corrected version is below.
The near-real-time release of Supreme Court audio is a recent development, but the court (who knew?) has been taping its sessions for more than 60 years. And now, everyone else can enjoy reams and reams of historical arguments and cases that heretofore were only given to historians, and even then, quite selectively.
The Oyez Project, supported by the Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago-Kent College of Law, has mined the National Archives and put them all together — hundreds of cases since 1955. And the Supreme Court will add the cases to its website by next week, according to NPR.
If you've ever wanted to hear how Roe v. Wade was argued, your feast will be bountiful.
Or Gideon v. Wainwright, which formalized the right to counsel. Or Griswold v. Connecticut, which formalized the right to contraception and expanded the legal definition of the right to privacy. Or New York Times v. Sullivan, which clarified libel law. They're all there.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How academia's liberal bias is killing social science
- Why Pakistan won't hunt down the terrorists within its borders
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Sorry, GOP, tax cuts don't pay for themselves
- Pope Francis' American problem
- Are there dogs in heaven? Let's hope not.
- Vox, derp, and the intellectual stagnation of the left
- For the last time: Congress is not exempt from ObamaCare
- Diagnosing the Home Alone burglars' injuries: A professional weighs in
Subscribe to the Week