Ten members of Congress — nine Democrats and one Republican — sent a letter to Washington Redskins owner Dan Snyder urging him to change the football team's name, which they said is offensive to Native Americans. The note also went to the 31 other NFL franchises, as well as the league's commissioner, Roger Goodell, and the Redskins' sponsor, FedEx.
The lawmakers gave new energy to an old demand — the team has been under pressure from activists for years to get a new name. Snyder said early this month that critics should drop it. "We'll never change the name," he told USA Today. "It's that simple. Never." Should Congress devise a way to force him to change his mind?
Plenty of people think the R-word is as insulting to Native Americans as the N-word is to African Americans, and that no word with that kind of racist tinge should be tolerated by the NFL. "I am somewhat embarrassed to be a fan of a team that has such an offensive name," former congressional candidate Krystal Ball, now a co-host of MSNBC's The Cycle, says. "It's time to move on. Let it go."
Washington, D.C., Councilman David Grosso offered the team an easy fix: Change the name to Redtails to honor the Tuskegee Airmen, he suggested earlier in May. "You can still sing the song and everything," he said, singing, "Hail ... to the ... Redtails." D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray has even suggested the city might link a name change to letting the team build a new stadium within the city limits.
Lawmakers on Capitol Hill have focused on another way to exert direct pressure on the team. Pat Garofalo at U.S. News & World Report points out that the lawmakers have alerted the NFL that they're pushing a bill that would amend the 1946 Trademark Act to cancel trademarks using the term "redskin." That, Garofalo says, would cut sharply into Snyder's income from marketing Redskins gear, because anybody would be able to slap the name on T-shirts and sell them.
So these 10 members of Congress hit on perhaps the best approach for getting Snyder to change his mind: Not going after his sense of decency, but his bottom line. [U.S. News]
But not everyone thinks Congress should wade into this fight. Abby Borovitz at MSNBC notes that 79 percent of respondents in an AP-GFX poll said the Washington Redskins shouldn't change their name, while only 11 percent said they should. And perhaps surprisingly, one group in particular isn't bothered by the team's moniker: According to the University of Pennsylvania's National Annenberg Election Survey, 90 percent of Native Americans find the team name acceptable.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- The real reason conservatives should be outraged that police killed a white youth
- 8 ways you're probably overspending without even realizing it
- 7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to
- Even critics of the euro didn't see this coming
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Why the West should accept ISIS as a sovereign nation
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- The secret to handling pressure like astronauts, Navy SEALs, and samurai
- 6 constitutional amendments that just missed the cut
- After Ferguson, we don't need another dialogue on race
Subscribe to the Week