Several paragraphs in the Presidential Policy Directive on cyberware — those about "emergency cyber actions" — will trouble civil libertarians and companies in the U.S. The reason is not so much the content of the paragraphs but the fact that the government felt it necessary to hide them.
Actually, the words "emergency cyber actions" are themselves classified!
Who wouldn't be suspicious of a SECRET document that spells out the fact that the government, acting under the national command authority, will act to shut down part of the internet if there's an existential threat?
I'm going to reprint the (S/NF) paragraphs in full because they seem to be something we'd want the government to do.
The caveats themselves (and the fact that THEY are secret) suggest that the government will truly revert to something like this in an absolute emergency.
And there is no reason why they can't admit that fact and then allow, encourage, and foster the debate that will result from it. Laying out these general rules, and then making them state secrets, endows them with a power that they ought not have.
And so forth. What the classification of this information says to the American people is: We don't trust you, so we are not going to give a basis for stuff we might do in the future that might make you trust us less.
Good job, secret-keepers.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How the South's ugly racial history is haunting ObamaCare
- The real story behind Deliver Us From Evil
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- If Democrats abandon immigration reform after Tuesday's likely loss, they will turn 2016 into a debacle
- What if Leo Strauss was right?
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- Beware of Splenda: The backlash against artificial sugars
- Stop making fun of philosophy and read some philosophy
- Feast your eyes on this beautiful linguistic family tree
Subscribe to the Week