Several paragraphs in the Presidential Policy Directive on cyberware — those about "emergency cyber actions" — will trouble civil libertarians and companies in the U.S. The reason is not so much the content of the paragraphs but the fact that the government felt it necessary to hide them.
Actually, the words "emergency cyber actions" are themselves classified!
Who wouldn't be suspicious of a SECRET document that spells out the fact that the government, acting under the national command authority, will act to shut down part of the internet if there's an existential threat?
I'm going to reprint the (S/NF) paragraphs in full because they seem to be something we'd want the government to do.
The caveats themselves (and the fact that THEY are secret) suggest that the government will truly revert to something like this in an absolute emergency.
And there is no reason why they can't admit that fact and then allow, encourage, and foster the debate that will result from it. Laying out these general rules, and then making them state secrets, endows them with a power that they ought not have.
And so forth. What the classification of this information says to the American people is: We don't trust you, so we are not going to give a basis for stuff we might do in the future that might make you trust us less.
Good job, secret-keepers.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- What is driving the increasingly weird behavior of the polar jet stream?
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How our botched understanding of 'science' ruins everything
- Christians have no moral rationale for spanking their children
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- Should you hope to die at 75? Absolutely not.
- The science of sex: 4 harsh truths about dating and mating
- Stop hating on cyclists
- Why America should team up with Bashar al-Assad's regime
Subscribe to the Week