Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard deposed Labor Party colleague Kevin Rudd in a dramatic 2010 party coup. On Wednesday, Rudd returned the favor, when a committee of Labor leaders voted to put him back at the head of the party in a closed-door, 57-to-45 vote. Gillard, Australia's first female prime minister, said she would ask Governor-General Quentin Bryce to swear Rudd in as her replacement.
Gillard also said she is quitting politics — a condition she herself placed on the loser of the contest when she called for the vote. This was Rudd's third challenge to Gillard since being ousted by her in 2010, and there was a very personal element to his victory, says Nick Bryant at BBC News. In effect, "Rudd has exacted revenge on Julia Gillard, his one-time friend and deputy who ruthlessly deposed him."
As for why the party went along with Rudd's third challenge, a mere three months after his second ouster attempt failed to really even get off the ground, "the calculation being made by Labor supporters is simple," says Neil Hume at the Financial Times:
An opinion poll on Tuesday projected that Labor under Ms. Gillard would lose 35 of its 71 seats in September's election. A second survey suggested that the return of Mr. Rudd as prime minister would deliver a 6-point lift in Labor's primary vote and save up to 18 seats. Few believe a Rudd-led Labor party can win the election. But his return offers the chance to staunch some of the damage that the party is likely to suffer at the polls. [Financial Times]
The projected winner in September is Tony Abbott, who leads the opposition Liberal-National coalition. It's not that Abbott is particularly popular, says the Financial Times' Hume, but he's getting a lot of mileage out of Labor's unpopularity. Rudd, "widely considered Australia's most popular politician," could turn Labor's fortunes around — or not.
Abbott may not be popular, but his proposals to scrap the Labor-enacted carbon tax and be tougher on asylum-seeking foreigners is polling well. "The Labor party may well change its leader, but it doesn't matter who leads the Labor party, it will still be much the same government with much the same policies," Abbott told reporters on Wednesday.
Aside from the eye-for-an-eye narrative, Labor's ousting of Gillard also signals lawmakers' desire for self-preservation, says the BBC's Bryant. "Labor is not only one of the most brutal political parties in the world, but also one of the most calculating and pragmatic," and it's not just generic members of parliament who were predicted to lose their seat under the outgoing prime minister. Many of the senators and cabinet ministers who voted Wednesday "calculate Mr. Rudd will at least prevent an electoral wipe-out, and maybe help save their own seats," too.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Watch out, China — America is working on dogfighting drones
- How liberals are unwittingly paving the way for the legalization of adult incest
- Why America won't have enough money to battle ISIS
- Why the Chinese military is only a paper dragon
- The troubling persistence of eugenicist thought in modern America
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How the Simpsons/Family Guy crossover revealed the worst of both shows
- Libertarianism's terrible, horrible, no good, very bad idea
- 11 facts yü should know about the umlaut
Subscribe to the Week