illabong is basically worthless, brah.
The Australian surf company said Tuesday it lost A$860 million in the year that ended in June, way more than the A$547 million loss analysts surveyed by Bloomberg expected.
In addition, Billabong wrote down the value of its namesake label — the 40 year-old brand that helped take Australian surf culture global — to zero dollars.
As this dude put it:
Billabong is dead-er than Hannah Montana.— Not Dane Reynolds (@Dranolds) August 27, 2013
Meanwhile, the value of its 13 other brands, including Kustom footwear and Von Zipper eyewear, fell to A$90 million in June, from A$614 million in December 2011.
So how did Billabong, which at its peak in 2007 hit a market value of A$3.84 billion, essentially wipe out?
For one, competitors like Abercrombie & Fitch have chipped away at market share, says Bloomberg. At the same time, Billabong's global expansion plan has loaded the company with debt.
In the last year alone, Billabong spent A$23.3 million on advisers to help with restructuring and other corporate jiggering — more than the value of its earnings before interest and tax. Chairman Ian Pollard said he'd rather have spent that money elsewhere, says Ad Age.
To cope, Billabong has closed 158 stores, cut 15 percent of its jobs in Europe, sold the DaKine brand, and cut its supplier list by 75 percent.
It also took out a loan from Altamont Capital Partners to refinance its debt.
However, debt restructuring won't get to the core of its troubles.
"It probably isn't cool any more for the youth of today to wear Billabong," Todd Guyot, an analyst at Moelis & Co. in Sydney, told Bloomberg. "You can see how much the core business has deteriorated over the last few years. There's still a massive challenge to get the business going right."
Lily Kuo explains at Quartz:
More importantly, its efforts to globalize the brand have killed its niche appeal. (It's not easy to appeal to a counterculture crowd of surfers and skateboarders if your stuff sells at Macy's). Andrew Warren and Chris Gibson, authors of a forthcoming book on the surf industry, say that when labels enter the mass market they lose credibility as local brands. No doubt surfers in California, Australia and Hawaii have moved on to sporting more obscure brands that reinforce their subculture. [Quartz]
Last year, Billabong rejected an A$850 million takeover bid that would have valued the shares at A$3.50. When markets closed in Sydney today they were worth just 53.5 cents.
Not the gnarliest move.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- What the collapse of the Ming Dynasty can tell us about American decline
- 7 ways to be the most interesting person in any room
- Here's proof that Justin Bieber is just as spoiled as you always thought
- Why is American internet so slow?
- Colorado’s new ‘drive high, get a DUI’ commercials are actually pretty clever
- Ukraine's fraught relationship with Russia: A brief history
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- The GOP must try to win over African-Americans
- 22 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Conspiracy theories spread in the wake of Malaysia Airlines flight disappearance
Subscribe to the Week