Secretary of State John Kerry said Friday afternoon that the United States was very confident that the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was responsible for the chemical weapons attack that hit the Damascus suburb of Ghouta last week.
Kerry claimed that a "preliminary U.S. government assessment determined that 1,429 people were killed" in the attack, including 426 children. That is higher than the initial death count estimated by opposition forces, which ranged from 213 to 1,300.
"In all of these things that I have listed, in all of these things that we know — all of them — the American intelligence community has high confidence, high confidence," Kerry said. "This is common sense. This is evidence. These are facts."
Kerry said this evidence shows that the Syrian military was preparing for the attack three days in advance, and that some military personnel had been warned beforehand to wear gas masks. He also tried to debunk claims by the Syrian government that rebels might have been the ones to use chemical weapons in Ghouta:
We know where the rockets were launched from, and at what time. We know where they landed, and when. We know rockets came only from regime-controlled areas and went only to opposition-controlled or contested neighborhoods. [via the Washington Post]
For four days afterward, the regime "shelled the neighborhood in order to destroy evidence," Kerry said.
Does that mean the United States is launching a military attack against Syria?
Kerry didn't explicitly say so. Instead, he called Assad a "thug and a murderer," and said that other countries like Iran and North Korea were "watching to see if Syria can get away with it, because then maybe they too can put the world at greater risk."
He said that the "United States of America makes our own decisions on our own timelines, based on our values and our interests," and that any decision President Obama "might decide to take" would be "limited," and would "not involve any boots on the ground" or "be open ended."
If the United States does take military action, it might have to do so without the U.K., where the British Parliament voted against taking any military action against Syria. The United States' closest ally right now is France — an ironic twist in light of the run-up to the Iraq War.
"France will be part of it," French President Francois Hollande told reporters. "France is ready."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How Israel's hawks intimidated and silenced the last remnants of the anti-war left
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- Why China thinks it could defeat the U.S. in battle
- The secret to handling pressure like astronauts, Navy SEALs, and samurai
- The big policy question libertarians can't answer
- Why your employer should clean your house and do your laundry
- The real lesson of Rick Perry's mug shot
- What you need to know before you support the police in Ferguson
- How the West produces jihadi tourists
- What the 'death of the library' means for the future of books
Subscribe to the Week