hile regularly gorging yourself on lobster flesh dripping in butter has the potential to shorten your life considerably, the crustacean's cells contain an enzyme that may hold the secret to eternal life.
Lobsters appear to be "biologically immortal," according to British biologist Simon Watt. The creatures are susceptible to disease, injury, and physical harm — as countless New England fisherman can confirm — but "unlike humans," says Watt, "they don't die as a result of their own metabolisms. There doesn't seem to be a built-in life expectancy in their cells."
Human cells continually replicate themselves, but can only do it a certain number of times before they die. As the cells die off, our bodies wither and age until we ourselves are dead. But lobsters are one of a select group of species that produce a large amount of an enzyme called telomerase, which rejuvenates cells and stops them from dying. When lobsters outgrow their shells, they simply grow new, harder shells — even as they reach 50 or 60 years of age. As a result elderly lobsters look as good as new, says Chris Gaylord at the Christan Science Monitor:
Ancient lobsters don't show any signs of aging. They do not slow down. They do not grow weaker. They do not become infertile. In fact, lobsters are actually more fertile in their old age. [Christian Science Monitor]
If we can successfully introduce a similar mechanism into human cells, there's the possibility that we could lengthen human lives indefinitely. Scientists at the University of Copenhagen have already mapped telomerase, the first step towards understanding what they call "the cellular fountain of youth." The project may soon help us develop cures for cancer — a disease which uses telomerase to replicate itself throughout the body.
But some scientists are skeptical about lobsters' ability to truly live forever. Lobsters may never stop growing, writes Marina Koren at Smithsonian Magazine, but that doesn't mean they never die. As lobsters get older, the energy required to shed their shells and recreate them anew has been observed to kill them. Between 10 and 15 percent die naturally "because the exertion proves to be too much," says Koren. And very elderly lobsters actually stop outgrowing their shells altogether — carting around old, worn-out shells that attract bacteria and begin to rot, eventually killing the creature off.
Others point out that if lobsters truly were immortal, the seas would likely be crawling with gigantic, centuries-old crustaceans that had grown into behemoths. In fact, the largest lobsters on record are between 30 and 40 pounds and thought to be no more than 100 years old. "A 'functionally immortal' animal that has a shorter recorded maximum lifespan than a human?" says invertebrate neuroethologist Zen Faulkes at his blog. "Color me unimpressed."
Immortality may not be such an attractive goal anyway. The planet would become overcrowded, and resources would quickly become scarce — we have problems funding Social Security and Medicare as it is. Besides, it would hardly be an end to mortal concerns, says David Derbyshire at The Daily Mail:
An extended life is not much use if that life is spent in suffering, either. Few people want eternal life, they really want eternal youth. And crucially, biological immortality doesn't mean you can't die — as the lobsters served in restaurants each day know all too well. [The Daily Mail]
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Will Fox News cost the Republican Party the 2016 election?
- Watch The Daily Show skewer Fox News over its food stamp obsession
- Watch Lady Gaga roast a pig, ride a bull, and get 'puked' on at SXSW
- What would a Rand Paul vs. Hillary Clinton presidential campaign look like?
- The American prison population, in one chart
- Rich countries think it's less important to believe in God than poor ones
- The Republican Party is becoming the party of ideas again
- The Flipside is a good example of why there's no conservative The Daily Show
- Get a raise: 10 steps to getting your boss to think you're the best
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
Subscribe to the Week