There is a standard serving size for a glass of wine in the U.S.: 5 ounces. Not that anyone is counting. One person's glass of wine is rarely the same as another's, be it a waiter's stingy pour at a fancy restaurant or the super generous portions of a hostess trying to get a dinner party kicked into high gear.
But even when tipplers are trying to be consistent, they rarely are. Researchers have shed some light on why people tend to pour — let's be honest — more wine than they think they are, and under what circumstances. "If you ask someone how much they drink and they report it in a number of servings, for a self-pour that's just not telling the whole story," says lead author Doug Walker, an assistant professor of marketing at Ohio State University. "One person's two is totally different than another person's two."
The researchers looked at several different factors, but the three biggest ended up being wine color, glass size, and position of the glass. The most intuitive finding is glass size: A wide wineglass receives 11.9 percent more wine than a normal-size goblet. "People have trouble assessing volumes," says Iowa State's Laura Smarandescu. "They tend to focus more on the vertical than the horizontal measures. That's why people tend to drink less when they drink from a narrow glass, because they think they're drinking more."
The fact that people pour more generous portions of white wines than reds makes some sense, too, when you think about it. And no, it's not just red wines tend to be valued more than whites — though dinner hosts probably are more generous with that California chardonnay than with the Brunello di Montalcino. It's that people can't really see how much white wine they're pouring into a clear glass, so they pour 9.2 percent more, the researchers found.
The third criteria is the biggest, and it's a puzzler: People tended to pour 12.2 percent more into a chalice when the recipient is holding the glass, versus when the glass is on a table.
What's the point of this study, published in the journal Substance Use and Misuse? The researchers want to help people who inadvertently overindulge in wine. Looking back after a few too many oversize glasses, people correctly named some of the reasons they overshot, notably that wide glasses make for large pours.
"They didn't think about it when pouring," says Walker. "Otherwise, they would have adjusted." That presumes that people want to drink 5-ounce glasses of wine.
But the research has useful applications for anyone serving wine to guests, too. In a world of overlabeling and overquantifying everything, "the wine pour is the last open frontier where you can still game the system a little," says Hank Campbell at Science 2.0. Only classless hosts and terrible bars use pour spouts with wine — "seriously, if the bartender does that, leave," Campbell advises — but if you can "master the psychology of wine glasses," you'll make your guests and your wallet happy.
The key, says Campbell, is glass size, and the rule of thumb is "too big a glass, and it looks like a joke to whoever is pouring. Too small, and you'll feel cheated."
Robert Myles at Digital Journal is more specific. Whether you're trying to keep your guests sober enough to drive home, or "less altruistically, just want to ensure your hospitality doesn't extend as far as a second bottle of Château Lafite Rothschild, so lovingly laid down all those years ago," he says, follow these tips: Use narrow, taller glasses, and always pour wine into goblets planted firmly on a table. "Good health!"
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How liberals are unwittingly paving the way for the legalization of adult incest
- Watch out, China — America is working on dogfighting drones
- Ted Cruz is the new Sarah Palin
- How the Simpsons/Family Guy crossover revealed the worst of both shows
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- Why you probably don't have Ebola — even if you shook hands with America's 'patient zero'
- Libertarianism's terrible, horrible, no good, very bad idea
- Bill O'Reilly and Stephen Colbert are accidentally having a serious debate on ISIS
Subscribe to the Week