- This just in April 2
In a landmark decision that could lead to even more expensive federal elections, the Supreme Court on Wednesday struck down longstanding limits on the aggregate amount of money individuals may donate to federal candidates and campaigns in a given election cycle.
In a 5-4 decision in the case of McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, the court ruled that the two-year caps on donations to federal candidates and political action committees violated the First Amendment. But the court left in place limits on how much individuals can donate to single candidates in a given election cycle. Currently, individuals may donate up to $2,500 per candidate per election. The now-nixed aggregate limits capped donations to all federal candidates at $46,200, and set the bar on donations to PACs and party committees at $70,800.
Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said the aggregate limits "do not further the permissible government interest in preventing quid pro quo corruption or its appearance."
"Spending large sums of money in connection with elections but not in connection with an effort to control the exercise of an officeholder's official duties, does not give rise to quid pro quo corruption," he added.- -
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How U.S. special forces are preparing for the worst-case scenario in North Korea
- I hate Ayn Rand — but here's why my fellow conservatives love her
- The 11 worst fast food restaurants in America
- Here's the schedule very successful people follow every day
- The weird obsession that's ruining the GOP
- Deficit scolds are the most crazed ideologues in America
- A scientific fact-check of 2001: A Space Odyssey
- 10 things you need to know today: July 24, 2014
- The biggest lesson Obama failed to learn from Bush
- 7 language habits that reveal your age
Subscribe to the Week