- Backlash April 3
A scathing op-ed in The New York Times alleges that Washington Redskins owner Dan Snyder did not found a charity to benefit American Indians for altruistic purposes, but rather to "buy enough good will so the [team] name doesn't seem so bad."
"In his news release and public statements, Mr. Snyder refers to 'our shared Washington Redskins' heritage," David Treuer, an Ojibwe author, writes. "To be clear: There is no 'our' that includes Mr. Snyder."
Snyder last month announced he'd founded the Washington Redskins Original Americans Foundation, ostensibly out of the goodness of his heart and because American Indians "need action, not words." But coming amid a backlash over the team's racist moniker, the move smacked of a PR stunt to tamp down the outrage. Treuer also claims that's Snyder's true motive, adding that the billionaire owner is interested in one thing: money.
Seldom has the entwined nature of ethics and money and influence been revealed as so unavoidably intestinal in its smell and purpose: to consume the material, to nourish the host and to expel the waste. American Indians — who do not see or refer to ourselves as "redskins" and who take great exception to the slur — are that waste. [New York Times]
Give the whole thing a read here.- -
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- How Israel's hawks intimidated and silenced the last remnants of the anti-war left
- Welcome to the age of ambivalent feminism
- The secret to handling pressure like astronauts, Navy SEALs, and samurai
- Why China thinks it could defeat the U.S. in battle
- 10 things you need to know today: August 20, 2014
- Why your employer should clean your house and do your laundry
- The real lesson of Rick Perry's mug shot
- What the 'death of the library' means for the future of books
- What you need to know before you support the police in Ferguson
Subscribe to the Week