Where Horton sits on abortion
Anti-abortion demonstrators have some nerve to claim that the message of "Dr. Seuss' Horton Hears a Who!"
Twentieth Century Fox's "Dr. Seuss' Horton Hears a Who!"—based on the classic 1954 children’s book about a gentle elephant—earned $45.1 million at the box office over the weekend—the biggest opening so far in 2008 (Variety). The success came a week after pro-life activists demonstrated against abortion outside the film’s Hollywood premiere, chanting that the story’s moral—a person’s a person, no matter how small—was a condemnation of abortion. (Slate)
What the commentators said
“Dr. Seuss must be turning in his grave,” said Amina Khan in a Los Angeles Times blog. “Pro-lifers” are “using Horton’s innocent words to support the personhood-at-conception argument?” The widow of Dr. Seuss, whose real name was Theodor Geisel, objects to any attempt to make political statements based on his characters. But the real scandal is that Geisel was very political—but he was a left-leaning editorial cartoonist. So the protesters are “disregarding Seuss’ rich liberal legacy” and the true messages of his work.
There’s nothing wrong with “pointing to a possible prophetic pro-life message embedded in this heart-warming tale,” said Craig von Buseck in the Christian Broadcasting Network’s ChurchWatch blog. Horton hears tiny voices from Who-ville, a town so small it fits on a speck of dust, and risks all to save it from outside forces trying to destroy it. It’s hard to deny there are “parallels” between “the underlying message of Horton Hears a Who! and the “pro-life position,” and there’s no reason the similarities shouldn’t be “prayerfully considered.”
“Last time I checked,” said Ellen Leventry in BeliefNet, “abortion was still legal in this country, copyright infringement less so.” But the real outrage is hijacking an event meant for kids, and scarring innocent children by using them as human shields in a culture war. “Wherever you stand on the issue, I think it can be agreed that the premiere of a children's movie is simply not an appropriate place to protest.”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
MOST POPULAR ON THE WEEK
- Watch out, China — America is working on dogfighting drones
- How liberals are unwittingly paving the way for the legalization of adult incest
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- The troubling persistence of eugenicist thought in modern America
- How the Simpsons/Family Guy crossover revealed the worst of both shows
- Why America won't have enough money to battle ISIS
- Why the Chinese military is only a paper dragon
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- Libertarianism's terrible, horrible, no good, very bad idea
Subscribe to the Week