Sixteen years after Anita Hill told senators that Clarence Thomas had subjected her to sexual harassment, said USA Today in an editorial, “the truth remains indeterminable.” But one thing is clear: “Thomas carries a huge chip on his shoulder.” In his memoir, he “comes off as a strikingly angry man, and not just about Hill.” He also seems to be angry that Reagan and the first Bush gave him “plum” jobs “in part because of race.”
If Thomas “weren’t a black conservative,” said Rich Lowry in the National Review Online, his memoir would be “hailed as a kind of classic.” It’s “a powerful, moving tale of a black man’s ascent from bone-crushing poverty to the pinnacle of the American system of government.” It’s true that the pages about Anita Hill’s allegations “pulse with anger,” but he insists he never mistreated her—so, can you blame him?
“Justice Thomas has every right to present himself as he wished in his new memoir,” said Anita Hill in The New York Times. “”But I will not stand by silently and allow him, in his anger, to reinvent me.” Thomas repeats “a litany of unsubstantiated representations and outright smears that Republican senators made about me” during his confirmation hearings. Luckily, complaints of abuse in the workplace are taken more seriously today than they were in 1991. But “our legal system will suffer if a sitting justice’s vitriolic pursuit of personal vindication discourages others from standing up for their rights.”
- 4 secret societies you probably don't know about
- Battle in a blizzard
- This is the twistiest tongue twister ever, says science
- Diagnosing the Home Alone burglars' injuries: A professional weighs in
- The secrets of happy families
- How to stick it to the poor: A congressional strategy
- Did God have a wife?
- Would you cuddle a stranger for $80 an hour?
- Why Newt Gingrich is getting flak for defending Nelson Mandela
- Which professions have the most psychopaths?
Subscribe to the Week