Emerging markets are popular with investors because “faster economic growth means higher returns,” says The Economist in an editorial. Only it doesn’t. According to a London School of Economics study of 17 countries, the economies with the slowest GDP growth “returned 8 percent a year,” while the fastest-growing ones returned only 5 percent. Other studies have found similar but wider disparities. “Why should this be?” In emerging markets, investors benefit if capital is reinvested in growing publicly traded companies, but many times it’s put instead into “unquoted” firms or state-run companies. This isn’t to “deny the importance of emerging economies.” It’s just to deny their greater profitability for investors.
401(k) follies and foibles
The world of the 401(k) plan “is far from ideal,” says Andrea Coombs in MarketWatch, and a study of almost a million workers illustrates the risks many Americans take with their nest eggs. One of the big “red flags” is that a quarter of workers 60 and older held more than half of their retirement account in their company’s stock. Investing primarily in just one company, or asset class, can have “dire consequences for retirement savers,” including lower returns and higher risks. Many investors also don’t take full advantage of matching retirement contributions, which is like turning down “free money.” Workers in lower income brackets made more investing mistakes, the study found, but “they weren’t alone.”
- The secrets of happy families
- 4 secret societies you probably don't know about
- Did God have a wife?
- How to stick it to the poor: A congressional strategy
- Diagnosing the Home Alone burglars' injuries: A professional weighs in
- Will John Kerry's foreign policy successes undercut Hillary Clinton?
- Why Newt Gingrich is getting flak for defending Nelson Mandela
- Why Republicans shouldn't get too excited over Obama's stumbles
- The emerging budget deal is a small victory for Republicans
- 10 things you need to know today: December 9, 2013
Subscribe to the Week