Fox News came under fire from liberal bloggers Thursday after the cable channel displayed text under an image of Michelle Obama identifying her as Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama’s “baby mama.” (The New York Times’ The Opinionator blog) Fox said the producer who chose the wording used "poor judgment." (Politico) Earlier, Fox News’ E.D. Hill was forced to apologize after saying that a fist-bump between Barack and Michelle Obama might have been a “terrorist fist jab.” (Chicago Tribune’s The Swamp blog)
What the commentators said
“Where do you even start” when criticizing Fox's “baby mama” slur? said Joan Walsh in Salon. Do you explain that "baby mama" is an African-American slang term “for the unmarried mother of a man's child, and not his wife, or even a girlfriend?" Is Fox "racist, or just clueless?”
There’s no reason to go “apoplectic,” said James Joyner in the blog Outside the Beltway. Mrs. Obama herself has referred to her husband as her “baby’s daddy,” and the term is now commonly used in the media to refer to white celebrities, such as Tom Cruise and Justin Timberlake. This is just another example of “manufactured outrage.”
Get used to it, said Sam Schechner and Rebecca Dana in The Wall Street Journal. "In a campaign that includes the first viable African-American presidential candidate, the lines of appropriate speech have become fuzzy." And a "broad network of self-appointed watchdogs" is ready to pounce every time the media step out of line.
Nothing will stop the coming summer of attacks on Michelle Obama, said Maureen Dowd in The New York Times. Now that Hillary Clinton is out of the race, Republicans “can turn their full attention to demonizing” the woman at the side of the Democrats’ presumptive nominee. There are “creepy” Web sites dedicated to painting Mrs. Obama as “an angry black woman.”
And there you have the Democrats’ defense, said commentator Michelle Malkin in her blog. Michelle Obama isn’t getting half the grief that Laura Bush does, yet liberals want the world to think “we are all somehow colluding in unfair and ‘brutal’ attacks on Barack Obama’s wife because we express profound disagreement with her public statements and policy pronouncements on the campaign trail.”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- The U.S. is about to sell weapons to Vietnam. That's bad news for China.
- Why is the Pentagon stuffing caves in Norway full of tanks?
- What the Middle Ages can tell us about the GOP's big charity myth
- 3 horrific inaccuracies in Homeland's depiction of Islamabad
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Gamergate has backfired spectacularly on its nincompoop perpetrators
- The simple trick to making better decisions in every aspect of life
- An open letter to #brands about Gamergate
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
Subscribe to the Week