The remarks came as Petraeus prepares to make a highly anticipated progress report next week. Several congressional studies released recently have said that Iraq’s army and its government have fallen short of most benchmarks set to measure their progress.
No matter what Petraeus reports next week, said Marco Martinez in USA Today, “it's worth reminding the American people—and all politicians in Washington—that the troops must not become the rope in a political tug of war on Capitol Hill.”
“Nobody wants U.S. troops to remain in Iraq forever,” said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial, “but neither is it in anyone's interests to see another humiliating American withdrawal.” So instead of rushing to leave—as some Democrats demand—Congress should pay attention to the abundant signs of progress Petraeus has already pointed out. Bombings are down since the surge began earlier this year. So are insurgent attacks. And Iraqi security forces number 360,000—up 20 percent from a year ago.
Democrats will probably “fall into their usual cringe” at the sight of Petraeus’ medals next week, said Paul Krugman in The New York Times (paid subscription required). But they need to screw up the courage to ask him tough questions. For example, why is it only the U.S. military that says violence is down? Morgue, hospital, and police records say civilians are dying in Iraq at twice the pace of last year. That’s progress?
- The man who sued his wife for birthing an ugly baby
- What to expect when you're expecting (100 years ago)
- Which professions have the most psychopaths?
- How to dramatically improve your memory
- Australia just scrapped its debt ceiling. America should, too.
- 5 books to read before your 30th birthday
- Why learning which of your Facebook friends hate you is a great idea
- Are differences in IQ to blame for income inequality?
- Watch The Daily Show pit Pope Francis against Fox News' 'War on Christmas'
- The 13-year-old CEO who invented a cure for hiccups
Subscribe to the Week