John McCain was right about the wisdom of the surge in Iraq, said Thomas Friedman in The New York Times, but “the right position on Iraq today is probably ‘McBama’—stick to a clear withdrawal timetable" but "leave yourself some wiggle room if things keep getting better, but not exactly on schedule.”
McCain thinks he can parlay his “heroic” defense of the surge into electoral victory against Democrat Barack Obama, said Jonah Goldberg in National Review Online. He’s wrong. “Voters don’t care about the surge; they care about the war.” They just “want it to be over—and in a way they can be proud of.”
That’s something that hardline hawks and war critics can finally agree on, said the Los Angeles Times in an editorial. Now that the Iraqis want a timetable for the departure of U.S. troops, we have a rare opportunity to form a consensus, declare victory, and leave.
Sure, if Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki tells us to leave, we should leave, said Max Boot in The Washington Post. But his call for a timetable might have just been an attempt to score points with Obama, or to gain leverage over our forces. The truth is that “the gains of the surge are fragile,” and they could be undone if we withdraw too soon.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why you shouldn't eat dog. Not even once.
- Why you should really take a nap this afternoon, according to science
- How U.S. special forces are preparing for the worst-case scenario in North Korea
- Why Israel can no longer let the Palestinian Authority be responsible for security in the West Bank
- Grammar quiz: Do you know the passive voice?
- How social conservatives became a minority in need of protection
- Here's the schedule very successful people follow every day
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Why charity can't solve society's deepest problems
- I hate Ayn Rand — but here's why my fellow conservatives love her
Subscribe to the Week