Move over, windfall profits tax, said Stephen Moore in The Wall Street Journal. There is now a “sillier” idea out there for fighting soaring gas prices—reviving the "despised and universally disobeyed" 55-mile-per-hour national speed limit enacted in 1974 after the OPEC oil embargo.
Motorists do love to drive fast, said John Dillin in The Christian Science Monitor via New Jersey’s The Record, but lowering the speed limit and getting all Americans to drive less “could have greater impact than oil from the Arctic.”
That’s why it’s so “curious” that more politicians haven’t jumped on this bandwagon, said the SavingAdvice personal finance blog. “Slower speeds do make a difference." During the two decades when our top speed was 55 mph the U.S. saved 167,000 barrels of oil a day, "which was about 2 percent of the country’s fuel consumption."
It's still unlikely Congress would pass something as unpopular as the 55-mph limit, said the Winston-Salem, N.C., Journal in an editorial. “But that does not mean traffic can't slow down and that vehicles can't operate more efficiently.” All we have to do is enforce the speed limits we already have.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- How liberals are unwittingly paving the way for the legalization of adult incest
- 10 things you need to know today: September 30, 2014
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- The troubling persistence of eugenicist thought in modern America
- Why the Chinese military is only a paper dragon
- Libertarianism's terrible, horrible, no good, very bad idea
- How the Simpsons/Family Guy crossover revealed the worst of both shows
- What the Romney boomlet says about the establishment GOP's feeble 2016 field
- Eric Holder blew it as attorney general. His replacement will, too,
Subscribe to the Week