The trouble with 401(k)s
West Virginia school teachers just returned to a traditional pension system, says Jennifer Levitz in The Wall Street Journal, after an unhappy 17-year experiment with 401(k)-type plans. Their experience, marked by too-safe investment choices that left too-small nest eggs, is “a cautionary tale for employers and employees.” It’s true that “many workers with retirement accounts have built nest eggs far bigger than they ever imagined possible,” but “unknowledgeable ones” often fall short, and traditional pension plans on average perform better than individual worker-managed retirement accounts. One problem, a lack of investment knowledge, is curable, but the lack of “fiscal discipline” might be harder to fix.
How to gain 401(k) investment knowledge
Part of the problem with 401(k)s, says Money’s Walter Updegrave in CNNMoney.com, is that 21 percent of Americans “turn to friends and relatives for advice” in picking their 401(k) allocations. There’s way too much at stake to have your “retirement prospects riding on odd Uncle Otto’s mutual fund picks.” You can hire a money manager to advise you, but the fees may make that unprofitable—unless your employer picks up part of the cost. But you can manage on your own, too, if you do “two key things: create a diversified blend of stock and bond funds and then rebalance annually.” You usually get free advice and other tools online. At the very least, try a target-date fund.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Is it now OK to have sex with animals?
- The hilarious hypocrisy of Republicans complaining about the imperial presidency
- After Ferguson: Stop deferring to the cops
- 10 things you need to know today: November 26, 2014
- In Ferguson, Michael Brown lost his life — and America's police lost the benefit of the doubt
- 7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Republicans love this new health care plan. Too bad it's basically a tax cut for the rich.
- In defense of Gwyneth Paltrow
Subscribe to the Week