he details of the U.S. government takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are complex, said Steven Pearlstein in The Washington Post, but “the rationale is quite simple: to restore some semblance of normalcy to the housing market.” That’s the bet that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is making in wresting control of the two public-private hybrid firms and “permanently changing the landscape of housing finance in America.”
It’s impossible to say how much Paulson’s bet will cost taxpayers, said Peter Coy and Theo Francis in BusinessWeek.com. Initially, it could be up to $200 billion, but if the housing market rebounds, it could cost taxpayers little or nothing. Either way, nationalizing the two giants is “a dramatic move” for a free-market conservative government.
Yes, it’s “the largest nationalization in U.S. history,” said Evan Newmark in The Wall Street Journal’s Mean Street blog, but “Paulson has cut a good deal for the taxpayer and the economy will be much the better for it.” Fannie and Freddie shareholders lose big, but taxpayers, debt holders, and mortgage applicants should come out ahead.
The takeover “was certainly the right thing to do—and it was done fairly well, too,” said Paul Krugman in The New York Times. But while it will help save Fannie and Freddie, and probably help lower mortgage rates, it won’t save the U.S. economy from its financial crisis. “Save the home lenders, save the world? If only it were that simple.”
- Which professions have the most psychopaths?
- 7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to
- China's massive pollution problem
- Watch The Daily Show use Pope Francis to hammer Fox Business pundits
- There is a better alternative to raising the minimum wage
- What to expect when you're expecting (100 years ago)
- 5 books to read before your 30th birthday
- All the World Cup mascots, ranked
- Science: Cuddling is key to a committed and loving relationship
- Girls on Film: How Lovelace fails to tell the real story
Subscribe to the Week