This year, said Julie Bosman in The New York Times, the Man Booker Prize “shortlist attracted more attention for who was not on it”—Salman Rushdie. The fact that the heavyweight author’s latest book The Enchantress of Florence wasn’t even nominated for “the most prestigious award for literary fiction in the English-speaking world” shocked some British critics and delighted others.
It is kind of surprising, said Carolyn Kellogg in the Los Angeles Times online, considering that “earlier this year, Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children was selected as the Best of the Bookers as part of the prize’s 40th anniversary.” But “seniority” may have worked against him—two of the six nominees “are first-time novelists.”
“What a relief,” said Kate Saunders in the Times Online. “Now I won’t feel obliged to read The Enchantress of Florence.” And besides, Rushdie’s an “old windbag these days”—I’m glad he didn’t “make this year’s young, sexy, colorful shortlist.”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why all drugs should be legal. (Yes, even heroin.)
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Are there too many good shows on television?
- Here's the schedule very successful people follow every day
- 7 ideas from ancient thinkers that will improve your modern life
- Why you should really take a nap this afternoon, according to science
- The weird obsession that's ruining the GOP
- The big, gaping hole in the liberal policy arsenal
- Comic-Con 2014: Everything we learned about Avengers 2, Batman v. Superman, and more
- The NFL is terrified of the culture war
Subscribe to the Week