o much for the “politics of hope,” said The New York Sun in an editorial. A new study from the University of Wisconsin says that since the conventions, 77 percent of Barack Obama’s ads have been negative, compared with 56 percent of John McCain’s ads. Obama talks about “wanting to bring Americans together,” but he’s sure running a “nasty” and “polarizing general election campaign.”
The problem with that Obama-as-“rabid attack dog” narrative, said Leslie Savan in The Nation, is that the UW study counts an ad as negative if it simply mentions the candidate’s opponent. So it equates McCain’s “utterly false charges” with Obama’s “accurate” ads portraying McCain as out of touch and “surrounded by lobbyists.”
Well, “American voters don’t share the punditocracy’s quadrennial alarm that this is The Most Negative Campaign Season Ever,” said Katherine Mangu-Ward in Reason online. A new Rasmussen poll shows that 55 percent of voters think this race is about as negative as in other years, and 20 percent “actually think things seem more civilized than usual.”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- 14 wonderful words with no English equivalent
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Why Easter is so important to Christians
- Why would a young person today be religious?
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- 10 things you need to know today: April 20, 2014
- How Captain America won over China
- If a nuclear bomb exploded in downtown Washington, what should you do?
Subscribe to the Week