After 18 months of “urging” Scholastic to stop supplying schools with the “highly sexualized” Bratz book series, said Becky Ebenkamp in Ad Week online, the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood cheered the publishing company’s decision to finally do it. But Scholastic is downplaying the group’s influence, saying they rotate the books they offer to schools all the time. What’s the real reason?
Who cares, said Amy Jussel in Shaping Youth, just as long those books are out of schools. Being an “anti-censorship media maven,” I’m usually “reticent about ‘book bans’ of any sort.” But when it comes to “sexualized slop like Bratz diva doll toxic commercialism with mind-numbingly vapid, unhealthy behavioral ‘bratitude’ and streetwalker style objectification,” I’m all for it.
How could anyone be against censorship, but in favor of this decision? said Stuart Woods in Quill & Quire. If Scholastic really did cave under pressure from this organization, then it’s a perfect example “of a small group of people imposing their values on a much larger group.” Is that the kind of society we want?
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- How academia's liberal bias is killing social science
- Why torture doesn't work: A definitive guide
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why the Sony hack changes everything
- Hey, bosses: Stop giving bonuses to your employees
- You should be furious about Hollywood's gutless retreat on The Interview
- Capitalism isn't a cure-all for Cuba
- Diagnosing the Home Alone burglars' injuries: A professional weighs in
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
Subscribe to the Week