fter 18 months of “urging” Scholastic to stop supplying schools with the “highly sexualized” Bratz book series, said Becky Ebenkamp in Ad Week online, the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood cheered the publishing company’s decision to finally do it. But Scholastic is downplaying the group’s influence, saying they rotate the books they offer to schools all the time. What’s the real reason?
Who cares, said Amy Jussel in Shaping Youth, just as long those books are out of schools. Being an “anti-censorship media maven,” I’m usually “reticent about ‘book bans’ of any sort.” But when it comes to “sexualized slop like Bratz diva doll toxic commercialism with mind-numbingly vapid, unhealthy behavioral ‘bratitude’ and streetwalker style objectification,” I’m all for it.
How could anyone be against censorship, but in favor of this decision? said Stuart Woods in Quill & Quire. If Scholastic really did cave under pressure from this organization, then it’s a perfect example “of a small group of people imposing their values on a much larger group.” Is that the kind of society we want?
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- 14 wonderful words with no English equivalent
- Attack of the invasive species
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- The world's dumbest idea: Taxing solar energy
- If a nuclear bomb exploded in downtown Washington, what should you do?
- How to make people like you: 6 science-based conversation hacks
- How the elderly are treated around the world
Subscribe to the Week