t’s anybody’s guess why North Korea has reversed its promise to dismantle its nuclear program, said The Washington Post in an editorial. It might be a bluff to get more concessions from the West, or a consequence of Kim Jong Il’s apparent illness. Regardless, “whoever is now in charge of North Korea” must be warned that backsliding will result in “economic strangulation.”
It would be wise to “push ahead with energy aid to the North,” said The Korea Times, at least until it’s clear what Kim’s regime is up to. Whatever the reason for the announcement that Pyongyang will restart the processing plant that produces plutonium for weapons, it’s important to avoid a “protracted impasse” that could “kill any remaining momentum” in North Korea’s denuclearization.
There’s no question that “one of the Bush administration’s rare foreign policy successes” is now unraveling, said Siobhan Dowling in Germany’s Spiegel Online. And this could be just the beginning. If Kim is finished, the center-left German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung observed, “the North Korea that will be unleashed on the world will be marked by power struggles and wild survival tactics.”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Here's proof that Justin Bieber is just as spoiled as you always thought
- What the collapse of the Ming Dynasty can tell us about American decline
- 7 ways to be the most interesting person in any room
- Why is American internet so slow?
- What would a U.S.-China war look like?
- The worrying rise of the anti-vaccination movement
- Why is it so expensive to build a bridge in America?
- 22 TV shows to watch in 2014
Subscribe to the Week