“The political media are up in arms because Sarah Palin won’t talk to them,” said Kirsten Powers in the New York Post, but it’s their own fault. No campaign will grant easy access when it knows “the press will make no honest attempt to be fair,” and the coverage of Palin has been massively biased from the start.
It’s hard to argue that the McCain-Palin camp isn’t going a bit overboard to protect Palin, said Chris Rovzar in New York magazine online. Either “Republicans are afraid Palin will crumble under direct questioning,” or, as CNN’s Campbell Brown complains, they’re making a sexist attempt to protect her as a “delicate flower” while selling her as a “pitbull with lipstick.”
If the press would stop “sniping” and pay attention, said Investor’s Business Daily in an editorial, it might see that Palin has been making serious foreign policy news. Her meetings with foreign heads of state this week “sent a stark message to the world’s tyrants” that a McCain administration would “stand by” America’s embattled friends.
Please, said the Chicago Tribune, if Palin’s hobnobbing had been serious John McCain would not have had her do it in a “news-free cocoon.” Everybody knows the first-term Alaska governor is no “whiz” on international relations yet. But, “you have to wonder, why is the McCain campaign so afraid?”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How the South's ugly racial history is haunting ObamaCare
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Stop making fun of philosophy and read some philosophy
- 10 things you need to know today: October 31, 2014
- If Democrats abandon immigration reform after Tuesday's likely loss, they will turn 2016 into a debacle
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Feast your eyes on this beautiful linguistic family tree
- Beware of Splenda: The backlash against artificial sugars
- What if Leo Strauss was right?
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
Subscribe to the Week