ouse Republicans led the “revolt of the nihilists” against the $700 billion economic rescue package, said David Brooks in The New York Times, and their short-sighted voting will backfire when the economy tanks. The plan “was nobody’s darling,” but by confusing “talk radio with reality,” and disregarding their leaders and the experts, they seem to be on a “single-minded mission to destroy the Republican Party” and its standard-bearer, John McCain.
McCain would be in trouble anyway, said Marc Ambinder in The Atlantic online, because voters blame Republicans for this “enormous, many-tentacled, fundamental economic failure.” McCain didn’t help himself by unsuccessfully intervening in negotiations, but Barack Obama didn't distinguish himself in the crisis, either.
No one in America’s “feckless political class” did enough, said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi created division with a “highly partisan speech” before the voting, and Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson was a horrible salesman for his plan. And President Bush is a “spent political force.”
The whole GOP ideal of “cowboy capitalism” is spent, said Howard Fineman in MSNBC online, and it’s only a mild exaggeration to say that “the Obama Administration began at midnight Sunday,” when the bailout package was finalized. Even if Obama loses, “our politics now [have] shifted seismically in his philosophical direction.”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Here's proof that Justin Bieber is just as spoiled as you always thought
- What the collapse of the Ming Dynasty can tell us about American decline
- 7 ways to be the most interesting person in any room
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Why is American internet so slow?
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like
- Why is it so expensive to build a bridge in America?
- The worrying rise of the anti-vaccination movement
- Can Rand Paul avoid the Neville Chamberlain trap?
- To build the Death Star, we'll need this space elevator
Subscribe to the Week