China’s tainted milk scandal should serve as a warning to the world, said the Seattle Post-Intelligencer in an editorial. “Because of global trading, there's no knowing where the tainted milk threat ends.” We clearly can’t rely on China for protection, and food trade has grown faster than any adequate system of international regulation.
Consumers need the tools to protect themselves, said the Los Angeles Times in an editorial. New U.S. laws will require “country of origin” labels on fresh meats and produce, but people need to know where ingredients in packaged and processed foods come from, too. “How can consumers send a message to this rogue food-producing nation if they don't know they're eating its food?”
Other countries should do more than sneer at China in “arrogant horror,” said Janet Bagnall in Montreal’s The Gazette. Milk-laced products in China have killed four babies and made more than 50,000 sick. But the death toll in Canada from listeria-tainted meat has reached 19. Maybe we should all get our houses in order.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- These 5 things will definitely happen after Obama moves on immigration
- 10 classic Sesame Street moments we wouldn't show today's kids
- What could happen if the Supreme Court rules against ObamaCare
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Why are newspaper comics so terrible?
- On immigration, Obama is flirting with tyranny
- Hillary Clinton needs to win big in 2016. Here's how she can do it.
- How neuroscience can help us understand political partisanship
- 10 things you need to know today: November 20, 2014
Subscribe to the Week