“We all owe a debt of thanks to the wing nuts,” on both "the far left and (gulp) the far right,” said Eugene Robinson in The Washington Post, who stalled the passage of President Bush’s $700 billion bailout plan. The bailout probably will, and probably should, clear the House today. But thanks to “all the skeptics” who refused to roll over, we at least had a week to “take stock” of how we got to where we're bailing out the “greed is good” Wall Street yahoos.
Blaming this mess solely on “a rapacious Wall Street” is a little hypocritical, said Bethany McLean in The New York Times. Wall Street sliced up and sold off our jumbo mortgages, but “who used the proceeds of a home equity line to pay for an elaborate vacation?” It’s unfair, but our small bite of the profit is partly to blame for our big bite of the bill.
Is an urgent bailout even necessary? said Daniel Parks in the Chicago Tribune. “I don’t know,” but the financial media is only covering those who say it is, and showering “breathtaking” condescension on anyone who thinks maybe Wall Street should suffer. “Scores of respected economists” back up those of us who think there might be a better way.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- These 5 things will definitely happen after Obama moves on immigration
- 10 classic Sesame Street moments we wouldn't show today's kids
- On immigration, Obama is flirting with tyranny
- What could happen if the Supreme Court rules against ObamaCare
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Hillary Clinton needs to win big in 2016. Here's how she can do it.
- Don't change a thing: 8 inventions that never needed updating
- 10 things you need to know today: November 20, 2014
- How neuroscience can help us understand political partisanship
Subscribe to the Week