The Supreme Court begins its new term Monday, said The New York Times in an editorial, and “the indications so far are that it could be a quiet year.” With the high court’s cases, once again, to be decided by the “swing vote” of Justice Anthony Kennedy, the “real excitement this fall” is over the “presidential race that could shape the court for years to come.”
It’s worth noting that if any justices retire under Barack Obama, the court would “stay pretty much the way it is,” said Ellen Goodman in The Boston Globe, since the three justices most likely to leave are liberals. If John McCain is elected, however, “Katy bar the door.” He has already “promised the court to the right wing.”
Well, the “claims of a conservative ascendency” have proved premature so far, said Jonathan Adler in National Review Online. But regardless of the court’s makeup, this year’s cases are unlikely to split along ideological lines—a useful reminder that Supreme Court litigation is not—or need not be—merely "politics conducted by other means.”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 10 things you need to know today: September 30, 2014
- How liberals are unwittingly paving the way for the legalization of adult incest
- The troubling persistence of eugenicist thought in modern America
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why the Chinese military is only a paper dragon
- Libertarianism's terrible, horrible, no good, very bad idea
- How the Simpsons/Family Guy crossover revealed the worst of both shows
- Are hedge funds doomed?
- 11 surprisingly apt lessons from Machiavelli's The Prince
Subscribe to the Week