"A fortnight away from the electoral abyss," said Bruce Reed in Slate, "conservatives are down to their last flare: warning what Democrats might do if there aren't enough Republicans left in Washington to stop them." Conservative commentators have even gone so far as to warn that the Democrats could win a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate and "usher in a 'crypto-socialist' era."
That's not just fear-mongering, said Paul Rubin in The Wall Street Journal. During the Great Depression, Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt pushed through the New Deal and expanded the role of government in "once unimaginable" ways. If Barack Obama—"one of the most liberal members of the Senate"—wins with an overwhelmingly Democratic Congress at his side, he'll have tremendous power to "push a liberal agenda."
The pundits are going overboard with their predictions of a "New Deal on steroids," said William Stuntz in The Weekly Standard. The financial bailout uses government money, but it's temporary—not some long-term nationalization of banks. "As for more New Dealish issues like health care, I wouldn't bet the ranch on radical change there either—even if November produces a Democratic sweep." The government just doesn't have the money.
- How does chocolate milk stack up as a sports drink?
- Why Republicans shouldn't get too excited over Obama's stumbles
- Diagnosing the Home Alone burglars' injuries: A professional weighs in
- The 10 worst-reviewed movies of 2013
- 10 things you need to know today: December 11, 2013
- The last racial taboo
- TIME chose Pope Francis as its Person of the Year. And it was the perfect choice for the Upworthy era.
- 7 enduring lessons from It's a Wonderful Life
- How did Love Actually become so controversial? A theory
- Watch The Daily Show mock the NSA and the gamers they're spying on
Subscribe to the Week