“If you had any doubts that we’re living in a new era,” said The Dallas Morning News in an editorial, Thursday’s congressional grilling of “the once godlike former Federal Reserve chairman” Alan Greenspan should settle them. During his 18 years as chairman, Greenspan was as close as the global economy had to a “Supreme Pontiff.” Now he's admitting that his gospel of unregulated free-market capitalism looks a little tattered.
And for a man “once remarkably hard to decipher,” said Steve Goldstein in MarketWatch, his admission of “shocked disbelief” in the market’s failure was “as clear as an empty Lehman Brothers office.” It just wasn’t “particularly convincing.” His theory was that banks’ self-interest would keep them honest—who’s surprised that their self-interest was in short-term gains?
He also failed to mention his contribution to the financial crisis: years of “ridiculously cheap” money, said the Los Angeles Times online. He rightly noted that “the Wall Street rocket scientists who designed derivative securities” were fatally optimistic. But “without cheap money, the credit-market bubble could never have reached the epic size that it did.”
Still, his “mea culpa” was the “honorable thing for him to do,” said David Leonhardt in The New York Times online, and it can’t have been easy. “Markets certainly do many things very well,” but we’ve moved a little too far “toward laissez-faire economics,” and one result is Greenspan’s bubbles. Now, maybe the Fed can “attack the next bubble” before it bursts.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 10 things you need to know today: October 30, 2014
- Beware of Splenda: The backlash against artificial sugars
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- For Democrats, the right lesson from 2014 is to be more liberal
- How to live a long life, according to science
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- Sorry, we will not all be having sex with robots in the future
- Is Amazon a monopoly?
- Yes, the Federal Reserve is politicized — and that's a good thing
Subscribe to the Week