Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez “is not feeling the love,” said The New York Times in an editorial. In state and local elections Sunday, opposition candidates won five of the 23 governorships, including in the most populous and richest states, and the mayoralties of Venezuela’s two biggest cities, Caracas and Maracaibo. Chavez can no longer “buy public sympathies,” and he should accept that more than half his citizens chose local rule by his opponents.
So how did the opposition come back from irrelevance? said The Washington Post in an editorial. After years of “extreme and counterproductive tactics”—boycotts, a national strike, an attempted coup—they “finally found a winning answer: democracy.” If they can now fight crime and manage public services better, Chavez is in real trouble.
The election was bad for Chavez, but it “hardly adds up to a stinging rebuke,” said Ben Whitford in Britain’s The Guardian. Opponents won the cities and urban slums and a decent foundation for a viable movement, but Chavez got more votes and won the rural areas by wide margins, and he can “legitimately claim a mandate” for his socialist “revolution.”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Watch out, China — America is working on dogfighting drones
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How liberals are unwittingly paving the way for the legalization of adult incest
- How the Simpsons/Family Guy crossover revealed the worst of both shows
- Why the Chinese military is only a paper dragon
- The troubling persistence of eugenicist thought in modern America
- Why America won't have enough money to battle ISIS
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- Libertarianism's terrible, horrible, no good, very bad idea
Subscribe to the Week