Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez “is not feeling the love,” said The New York Times in an editorial. In state and local elections Sunday, opposition candidates won five of the 23 governorships, including in the most populous and richest states, and the mayoralties of Venezuela’s two biggest cities, Caracas and Maracaibo. Chavez can no longer “buy public sympathies,” and he should accept that more than half his citizens chose local rule by his opponents.
So how did the opposition come back from irrelevance? said The Washington Post in an editorial. After years of “extreme and counterproductive tactics”—boycotts, a national strike, an attempted coup—they “finally found a winning answer: democracy.” If they can now fight crime and manage public services better, Chavez is in real trouble.
The election was bad for Chavez, but it “hardly adds up to a stinging rebuke,” said Ben Whitford in Britain’s The Guardian. Opponents won the cities and urban slums and a decent foundation for a viable movement, but Chavez got more votes and won the rural areas by wide margins, and he can “legitimately claim a mandate” for his socialist “revolution.”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- This is what happens when Republicans actually enact their radical agenda
- How I dug myself out of debt — and stayed that way
- Russia is stealthily threatening America with nuclear war
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- 10 things you need to know today: September 18, 2014
- The science of sex: 4 harsh truths about dating and mating
- Why so many Christians won't back down on gay marriage
- An independent Scotland will need its own army, navy, and air force — and that could be a problem
- The Obama administration's nonstop incoherence on ISIS
Subscribe to the Week