“Baz Luhrmann has named his new movie after a continent,” said Ty Burr in The Boston Globe, “which should give you a clue to his modest ambitions.” Starring Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman, Australia unfolds between 1939 and 1942 and attempts “to balance the epic destruction of a city with the closing of a nation's racial wounds,” while also trying to keep the film’s two lovers “dancing around each other.” But all this effort “costs” Luhrmann his “natural brio,” and ultimately “all you can see is the strain.”
Luhrmann is “a maximalist,” said Manohla Dargis in The New York Times. He “doesn’t simply want to rouse your laughter and tears, he wants to rouse you out of a sensory-overloaded stupor with jolts of passion and fabulous visions”—and with Australia, he succeeds. This movie feels “like a sincere cry from the swelling, throbbing heart—a true expression of self.”
But Australia “needs to be approached with caution and a degree of patience,” said Stephanie Zacharek in Salon. This movie is a lot of things: It’s “an ambitious scramble, a sometimes dazzling, sometimes ludicrous epic that strives to meld history, politics, religion and morality into a fat, engrossing story.”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- The world's dumbest idea: Taxing solar energy
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Attack of the invasive species
- 14 wonderful words with no English equivalent
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Which states get screwed worst by the Electoral College?
- 10 things you need to know today: April 19, 2014
- If a nuclear bomb exploded in downtown Washington, what should you do?
Subscribe to the Week