“For a man who blithely admits to having sex with” a 13-year-old girl, said Xan Brooks in the Guardian, Roman Polanski is sure good at playing the victim. The Oscar-winning director is “lobbying for the dismissal” of that “notorious” Hollywood sex case, hoping it might allow him to return “to the country he absconded from in 1978.” Might Polanski be “an amoral coward who ran away from trouble and now demands a Get Out of Jail Free card?”
There is no doubt that Polanski “is a creep for what he did,” said Brad Brevet in Rope of Silicon. But “you don't have to believe Polanski is a good man to realize he stood trial and was ultimately treated unfairly” by “a publicity seeking judge.” If you look at the whole story, you might decide that you “would have fled as well.”
Nothing can “change the fact that he drugged and had sex with a 13-year-old girl,” said Roger Moore in the Orlando Sentinel. But “Hollywood loves to forgive and forget, and if he can remove that ‘fugitive from justice’ label on the grounds that the judge and DA were out to get him,” Polanski “will work in Tinseltown again.”
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Bush vs. Clinton in 2016 is the perfect way to make millennials hate politics even more
- The latent sexism of the male marriage proposal
- After Ferguson: Stop deferring to the cops
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- The week's best photojournalism
- Diagnosing the Home Alone burglars' injuries: A professional weighs in
- This judge is the reason we're still fighting over net neutrality
- The hilarious hypocrisy of Republicans complaining about the imperial presidency
- Is it now OK to have sex with animals?
Subscribe to the Week