he indictment of five Blackwater Worldwide guards "may look like an exercise in accountability," said Eugene Robinson in The Washington Post, but it's probably just "a whitewash." That's because accusing these men of manslaughter for the "horrific massacre of more than a dozen Iraqi civilians" on Sept. 16, 2007, "absolves the government and corporate officials who should bear ultimate responsibility."
Maybe, but a trial is absolutely necessary, said The Dallas Morning News in an editorial. The victims and their families deserve justice, and the U.S. needs to show Iraqis that its contractors can't kill with impunity. Prosecuting the Blackwater guards "marks an important step toward repairing years of damage inflicted by a few Rambo-style private gunslingers."
But remember, said the Boston Herald in an editorial. This is an indictment of a handful of guards, not of the use of private security contractors in a war zone. The use of private contractors in Iraq helped stretch our military resources by freeing up soldiers from "peripheral duties," such as guarding diplomats, to focus on their mission. "But just as members of the military are not immune from prosecution should they exceed their authority, civilians must be held accountable, too."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why China's Communist Party is headed for collapse
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why Texas Republicans may want to cool the anti-Obama land-grab talk
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Why the poor's investment of choice is so alarming
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- How to make perfect fried rice in 6 easy steps
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- Obama doesn't have a manhood problem — but conservatives certainly do
- Why we need a maximum wage
Subscribe to the Week