hat a welcome change, said Asim Qureshi in Britain’s The Guardian: America’s new president, Barack Obama, ordered a stop to the military tribunals at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, so he could consider how to overhaul them. But it will take a lot more than this to prove “that the U.S. has truly changed its attitude” toward detaining Muslim suspects in the “war on terror.”
It’s encouraging that Obama has backed away from his campaign promise to close Guantánamo entirely, said Investor’s Business Daily in an editorial. “That shows flexibility and wisdom. He'll need both, since the U.S. faces a terrorist threat that will take advantage of our inattention or our weakness to kill as many of us as possible, without remorse.”
Keeping Guantánamo open isn’t the way to stop them, said Jacob Sullum in Reason. The detention camp there, where the Bush administration wielded unchallengeable authority, merely sends the world the message that “we know who the bad guys are,” and we won’t let anybody second-guess us—even when we’re wrong. Obama has to follow through on his promise to close Guantánamo to show that the era of Bush’s arrogant unilateralism is over for good.
Wait, I'm confused, said Megan McArdle in The Atlantic. Suspending the military tribunals for 120 days is one thing, but the big problem at Guantanamo was that people were being held without trial. "Doesn't this just further prolong the incarceration of anyone who might be innocent?"
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- The world's dumbest idea: Taxing solar energy
- Why would a young person today be religious?
- Israel and Russia are getting along. Have the neocons noticed?
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Which states get screwed worst by the Electoral College?
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- 10 things you need to know today: April 18, 2014
- Why Good Friday is so important to Christians
- How moderns celebrate Good Friday and Easter
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
Subscribe to the Week